TOM J. DUPREE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
TOM J. DUPREE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
88 Fla. 106
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.'
The judgment herein is reversed on the authority of Gordon v. State. 86 Fla. 255, 97 South. Rep. 428; Norwood v. State, 80 Fla. 613, 86 South. Rep. 506. See also State ex rel Lockmiller v. Mayo,and Benson v. State decided at this term.
Reversed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Benigo Fernandez, 156 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…for beverage purposes. So, it was held that the indictment on the charge of second offense should allege not merely the fact of illegal possession of liquors, but of [*404] illegal possession for sale. See to the same effect, Dupree v. State (1924) 88 Fla. 106, 101 So. 232. Compare Reynolds v. State (1927) 92 Fla. 1038, 111 So. 285.” The annotator, in discussing the Federal cases (58 A.L.R. 70) states: “The court in McCarren v. United States (1925; C.C.A. 7th) 8 F.(2d) 113, held that the manner in which…
Authorities Cited
- Columbus Norwood v. State, 80 Fla. 613 (Fla. 1920)
- Gordon v. State, 86 Fla. 255 (Fla. 1923)