GERRY B. GREENE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Donnie Lee Prince v. State, 719 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …d his argument to be without merit and affirm the order denying his latest motion. This latest appeal is procedurally barred and constitutes an abuse of the judicial system. Fla.R.Crim.Pro. 3.850(f)(1998); Greene v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1270, 716 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)(barring successive motions to correct illegal sentence). We hereby prohibit him from filing any pro se petition or appeal that raises an issue that has been resolved in one of the prior cases he has filed in this court. If he vio…
• Freeman v. State, 773 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …proceeding attached to it the order dated July 20, 1992, which establishes this ground was previously raised and ruled upon on the merits. Thus that ground is improperly raised again, and is successive. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f); Greene v. State, 716 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). AFFIRMED. HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . Freeman v. State, 605 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).…
• Alvarez v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 75 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …actions, when a plaintiff seeks discovery regarding other products manufactured by the defendant, Florida courts have uniformly held that the other products must be “substantially similar” to the subject product. See Nissan Motors Corp. v. Espinosa, 716 So. 2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Am. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Osborne, 651 So. 2d 209, 210-11 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Caterpillar Indus., Inc. v. Keskes, 639 So. 2d 1129, 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The burden is on the plaintiff to demonstrate “substantial similarity…

  ← 1 / 2 →