TERRY SLAGLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1998-07-15
No. 97-3477
MINER, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
716 So. 2d 806 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. Viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to sustaining the order, we find that the state never established that appellant was in such proximity to the area where the evidence was discovered to justify the search and seizure as incident to lawful arrest.

MINER, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • J.H. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 890 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
    …f the cause. See § 39.521(1), Fla. Stat. (disposition hearing shall be conducted if parents have consented to the finding of dependency or admitted the allegations in the petition). See generally Bembry v. Department of Children and Family Services, 716 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (reversing, dependency disposition order due to lack of notice of hearing). DCF additionally observes that the trial court failed to follow Chapter 39, Florida Statutes, when it granted permanent custody of the child to the fathe…
  • R.P. and M.P. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 779 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
    …PER CURIAM. We reverse in part the order and judgment under review and remand for a new hearing after proper notice is provided to the appellants. See Bembry v. Department of Children and Family Services, 716 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1998). Because the appellants’ lack of notice was the only issue properly before this Court, the order and judgment at issue are only reversed to the extent they permanently terminate the appellants’ visitation rights, eliminate them a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw