CITY OF GAINESVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
DOUGLAS F. ENGLERT A/K/A D.F. ENGLERT AND TAMMIE J. ENGLERT, APPELLEES
ALLEN, Judge.
The City of Gainesville challenges a final judgment by which the trial court dismissed the city’s petition for a court order authorizing the city to enforce an order of the City of Gainesville Code Enforcement Board in the same manner as a court judgment. By its order, the board had imposed a fine for the appellee’s violation of provisions of the Gainesville Code of Ordinances. In dismissing the city’s petition, the trial court concluded that the only enforcement method available to the city pursuant to section 162.09(3), Florida Statutes, is an action to foreclose a lien. Although the subsection does authorize a lien foreclosure action as a method of enforcement, the second sentence of the subsection specifically authorizes the enforcement method sought by the city in the present case. Because the trial court erred in concluding that the enforcement method sought by the city is not authorized by the statute, we reverse the final judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
WOLF, J., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Novotny v. The Est. OF Lillian S. Dantone, 848 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…te; and (iii) whether Novotny waived his claim. As to the first issue, the capacity of a party to enter into the contract is a material issue of fact. See generally Forrest v. J.L. Young and Co., 198 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Hemker v. Abdul, 716 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The record before us clearly establishes that there is a dispute over the validity of the contract based on Dantone’s capacity to enter into the contract. Our conclusion is supported by the estate’s affirmative defense that Dant…
-
Georges M. Delbrouck v. Eberling, 226 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…uence and lack of capacity. The petition, and subsequent deposition evidence, raised factual issues which were not refuted by the personal representative at the summary judgment hearing. The Second District considered this issue in Hemker v. Abdul, 716 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Hemker, like the case at bar, involved a petition to revoke probate. Id. at 818. Also just like in the case at bar, the petition in Hemker to revoke probate asserted lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. Id. The tria…