M.P., NATURAL MOTHER OF S.P., R.P., AND L.P., CHILDREN, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, APPELLEE; R.R.P., NATURAL FATHER OF S.P., ET AL., APPELLANT, V. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Appealable Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See G.L.S. v. Department of Children and Families, 700 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (adjudicatory order in which parental rights are terminated is final, appealable, order), review granted, Case No. 91,771, — So. 2d-(Fla., 1998). However, the dismissal is without prejudice to appellants’ right to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, seeking a belated appeal. See In the Interest of E.H., 609 So. 2d 1289 (Fla.1992). As we did in G.L.S., we certify conflict with the decisions of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Moore v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 664 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), and Lewis v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 670 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
APPEALS DISMISSED.
JOANOS, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Hollywood v. Witt, 939 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…ned, the reversal of the underlying judgment necessitates the reversal of the fee award. See, e.g., Keybank Nat'l Ass’n v. Int’l Fin. Bank, 875 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Marty v. Bainter, 727 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Further, just as our reversal of the underlying judgment in the initial appeal necessarily implied the reversal of the prevailing party attorney’s fee award, our reversal of the underlying judgment in this appeal requires revers…
-
Glenna Fisher v. Perez, 947 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…rebutted. Accordingly, Perez was not entitled to a directed verdict on the issue of negligence. The issue of negligence, dependent upon the conflicting testimony of the parties, should instead have been submitted to the jury. See Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114, 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(“A directed verdict cannot stand where there is any competent evidence to support the non-movant’s position.”); cf. Cheng v. Sirichoke, 745 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(con-flicting testimony as to traffic conditions on bu…
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mazzorana, 731 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…ecause we have reversed this case for a new trial on the issue of damages, we necessarily reverse the final judgment for attorney’s and expert witness fees and costs awarded in favor of Mazzorana. See § 768.79, Fla. Stat. (1997); Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In the Interest OF E.H., 609 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1992)
- Moore v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 664 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Lewis v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 670 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- G.L.S. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 700 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)