ROBERT LORENZANA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT LORENZANA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
717 So. 2d 119
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant claims error in resentencing when the court imposed restitution as part of his sentence for the first time on remand. However, appellant neither objected at sentencing nor filed a motion to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Thus, the issue is not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 715 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Affirmed.
STONE, C.J., and WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Woods v. Nova Cos. Belize Ltd., 739 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…al treatment, the court in Resorts International v. Spinola, 705 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 718 So. 2d 170 (Fla.1998), recognized that “Florida has no interest in this oút-of-country accident.” Additionally, the court in Turner v. Koren, 717 So. 2d 119, 120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), noted that: Florida has no interest in committing its judicial time and resources to the litigation of this action which calls for the [*625] application of foreign law in relation to a[n out-of-country] vehicle accident wh…
-
Fillyaw v. State, 734 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…725 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(hold-ing restitution issue was not preserved for appeal where appellant neither objected at sentencing nor filed a motion to .correct sentence pursuant to Florida.. Rule of Criminal Procedure); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(same); cf. Locke v. State, 719 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA T998)(en banc)(holding trial court’s failure to orally itemize statutorily authorized discretionary costs at the time of sentencing was not fundamental error because Rule 3…
-
McLEAN v. State, 732 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…ng or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit. AFFIRMED. BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.…
Authorities Cited
- Hyden v. State, 715 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)