JOHN RUSSELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
JOHN RUSSELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
88 Fla. 166
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
There being ample evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty of manslaughter upon which the judgment of conviction herein was predicated, and no other contentions being made, the judgment is affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hazen v. Cobb, 96 Fla. 151 (Fla. 1928)…t erred in sustaining the demurrer interposed thereto. It contained all of the essential elements of a count in special assumsit. 2. R. C. L. 765-6; 5 C. J. 1393 et seq.; Carson’s Fla. Com. Law. Pldg., 51; Borden Lumber Co. v. So. Stl. Dry Dock Co., 88 Fla. 166, 101 So. R. 846. It also alleged the change in the name under which the defendant partners did business, after the contract was made, from Cobb Motor Company to Cobb-Vaughan Motor Company. This was sufficient to show that the parties sued were the s…1 / 2
-
Everglade Lumber Co. v. Nettleton Lumber Co., 111 Fla. 333 (Fla. 1933)…ay be had on the common counts, although there is a special contract, whenever, by breach'of it, the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum in numero, or which may be rendered certain by calculation. Borden Lumber Co. v. South Atlantic Dry Dock Co., 88 Fla. 166, 101 Sou. Rep. 846. [*337] Therefore, plaintiff’s suit on the common counts for the recovery of the contract purchase price of the lumber alleged to have been bargained, sold and delivered to the defendant was an appropriate means of enforcing the d…