ROGER COOPER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• J.M.B. v. State, 750 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
  …he voluntariness of a plea after sentencing by filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This rule, however, does not apply to juvenile proceedings. See A.F. v. State, 718 So. 2d 260, 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); cf. T.G. v. State, 717 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (explaining that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 does not apply in juvenile proceedings). But a writ of habeas corpus is available to a juvenile. See In Interest of W.B., 428 So. 2d 309, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We agree…
• K.O. v. State, 765 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …venile Procedure do not contain a similar proceeding to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), which allows a criminal defendant an opportunity to request correction of an illegal sentence within 30 days of sentencing. See A.F.; T.G. v. State, 717 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Therefore, since there is no collateral review in juvenile delinquency proceedings comparable to adult proceedings and the criminal appeal statute is inapplicable, this issue may be raised for the first time on appeal. Id. In s…
• Cooper v. State, 743 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …hin the 15-year statutory maximum. See § 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1995). Furthermore, we reject the state’s contention that the law of the case requires us to affirm. Although Appellant’s sentences were addressed by this court in Cooper v. State, 717 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), this issue was not resolved in that appeal. KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. . We note that the validity of the multiplier is not at issue here. See O.C. v. State, 722 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. granted, 727 So. 2d…

Authorities Cited

• Aleño Santana Madrigal v. State, 683 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)