RODMAN LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
LAWRENCE FARMER, A MINOR, BY MARCUS C. FAGG, HIS NEXT FRIEND, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
RODMAN LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
LAWRENCE FARMER, A MINOR, BY MARCUS C. FAGG, HIS NEXT FRIEND, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
88 Fla. 185
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This case having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon' the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Soberon v. State, 545 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…ll or ditch’ before taking a life.” ... The “one interposing the defense ... must have used all reasonable means in his power, consistent with his own safety, to avoid the danger and to avert the necessity of taking human life....” Linsley v. State, 88 Fla. 185, 101 So. 273 (1924). Baker v. State, 506 So. 2d 1056, 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 515 So. 2d 229 (Fla.1987).2 Moreover, “a defendant must demonstrate that the situation would induce a reasonably prudent person to believe both that danger was…