CHARLIE EDWARD RODGERS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
CHARLIE EDWARD RODGERS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
717 So. 2d 1073
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. McCray v. State, 699 So. 2d 1366 (Fla.1997).
WOLF, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Storm v. The Town OF Ponce Inlet, 866 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…sioners, 493 So. 2d 1002, 1005 (Fla.1986). Many decisions by courts after Kaisner have employed this two-step approach. See Henderson v. Bowden, 737 So. 2d 532 (Fla.1999); Vann v. Dept. of Corrections, 662 So. 2d 339 (Fla.1995); Austin v. Mylander, 717 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 729 So. 2d 389 (Fla.1999); Sams v. Oelrich, 717 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 725 So. 2d 1109 (Fla.1998); Garcia v. Reyes, 697 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); White v. City of Waldo, 659 So. 2d 707 (Fla.…
-
Manfre v. Shinkle, 184 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)…ental liability unless a common law or statutory duty of care existed that would have been applicable to an individual, as opposed to the .general public, under similar circumstances.” (citing Pollock, 882 [*646] So. 2d at 931)); Austin v. Mylander, 717 So. 2d 1073, 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (“A governmental duty to protect its citizens is a general duty to the public as a.whole, and where there.is only a general duty to protect the public, there is no duty of care to an individual citizen which may result in l…
Authorities Cited
- Ervin McCRAY v. State, 699 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 1997)