STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT MARTIQUE WEST, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appeals a downward departure sentence imposed on West for probation violation. The trial court imposed six months community control followed by five years probation instead of the guidelines sentence but failed to provide written reasons for the departure either at sentencing or within the required timeframe. The court reverses and remands because timely written reasons for departure sentences are mandatory.
A trial court must provide timely written reasons for any departure sentence, upward or downward. Belated written reasons supplied after appeal cannot cure this defect because the trial court loses jurisdiction after appeal. The reasons provided must pertain to the crime being sentenced, not merely the probation violation.
[1] A trial court must provide timely written reasons for a downward departure sentence.
[2] A trial court loses jurisdiction to amend a sentence after an appeal has been filed.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Timely written reasons for departure sentences, upward or downward are required. § 921.0016(l)(c); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll).”
Establishes the mandatory requirement for written reasons accompanying any departure sentence in Florida.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWest was on probation after conviction for two counts of robbery with a deadly weapon and one count of attempted robbery with a firearm. West violated…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Guidelines Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
W. SHARP, Judge.
The state appeals a downward departure sentence imposed on West. While on probation, after having been convicted of two counts of robbery with a deadly weapon and one count of attempted robbery with a firearm, West was found to have violated his probation and was sentenced to six months of community control, followed by five years probation. Although there may have been reasons for the downward departure sentence,1 the trial court gave no written reasons and articulated none at the sentencing hearing.2
We have no choice in this ease but to reverse and remand for imposition of a guidelines sentence. State v. Smallwood, 664 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), abrogated other grounds, State v. Gitto, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1550 (Fla. 5th DCA June 26, 1998); Hill v. State, 599 So. 2d 127, 128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Timely written reasons3 for departure sentences, upward or downward are required. § 921.0016(l)(c); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.701(d)(ll). We think the trial court’s belated effort in this case to supply written reasons after an appeal was taken cannot cure the defect since the trial court had by that time lost jurisdiction.4 In any event, the reasons given pertain to the violation of probation incident, not the original crime for which West was being sentenced. This is clearly erroneous. Tossio v. State, 634 So. 2d 244, 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . The permitted range under the guidelines was 4)4 to 9 years in prison and the recommended range was 5)4 to 7 years in prison.
. After this case had been appealed by the state, the court sua sponte made written findings that (a) the court had become solely focused on a different sentencing decision and failed to follow a more deliberate and systemic approach to the issues at hand; (b) one could conclude from the record that West committed a misdemeanor trespass rather than a burglary; and (c) if the sentence was a downward departure, the court failed to set forth written findings within fifteen days as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702. The court noted, however, that one could conclude that a mitigating factor found in section 921.0016(4)(j), unsophisticated manner and isolated incident, applied in this case.
. In limited circumstances, oral reasons may suffice. See Reid v. State, 673 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Wilcox v. State, 664 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18).
. Domberg v. State, 661 So. 2d 285, 286-287 (Fla. 1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Domberg v. State, 661 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1995)
- Garcia v. Gold Coast Mother & SON, 664 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Wilcox v. State, 664 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- State v. Smallwood, 664 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Reid v. State, 673 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Hill v. State, 599 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Tossio v. State, 634 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)