ANGEL VELOSO, M.D., AND ANGEL VELOSO, M.D., P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
CARIDAD GONZALEZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAUL GONZALEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1998-09-16
No. 98-1068
Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
718 So. 2d 325 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It is our view that the question presented on this appeal was determined adversely to the appellants in the prior appeal, see Gonzalez v. Veloso, 702 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and accordingly we affirm the judgment under the doctrine of the law of the case. See Valsecchi v. Proprietors Ins. Co., 502 So. 2d 1310, 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gonzalez v. Angel Veloso, M.D., 731 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …79, Florida Statutes (1997),1 for the trial and appellate services of her counsel in the medical malpractice action for the wrongful death of her husband we considered in Gonzalez v. Veloso, 702 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) and Veloso v. Gonzalez, 718 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 3d DCA [*64] 1998). She challenges the lower court’s rulings that rejected her claim to a multiplier and denied expert witness fees for the attorneys who testified on her behalf at the hearing. We affirm in both respects. As in Simmons v. Roy…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw