RODNEY MCHOME, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RODNEY MCHOME, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
718 So. 2d 343
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 27 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Rodney McHome appeals his judgment and sentence for violation of probation. We affirm the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, we agree that the trial court did not enter an order revoking Mr. McHome’s probation, and therefore remand this case to the trial court with directions to enter a proper probation violation order specifying which condition of his probation Mr. McHome violated. See Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Mr. McHome need not be present for this purpose.
Affirmed, but remanded with instructions.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Austin v. Austin, 12 So. 3d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…n this case, the lack of adequate findings hampers meaningful appellate review. See Williams, 923 So. 2d at 608; Obrenski v. Obrenski, 817 So. 2d 877, 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Farley v. Farley, 800 So. 2d 710, 711-12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Milo v. Milo, 718 So. 2d 343, 344-45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). With respect to attorney’s fees, our reversal of the equitable distribution scheme and alimony award will require that the trial court reconsider attorney’s fees on remand. We are reluctant to order a new trial but dete…
-
Valentine v. van Sickle, 42 So. 3d 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…606, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)). “The requirement that the final judgment contain specific findings of fact is to facilitate meaningful appellate review of the trial court’s award or denial of alimony.” Williams, 923 So. 2d at 607 (citing Milo v. Milo, 718 So. 2d 343, 344 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)). The failure to make the required findings may constitute harmless error when appellate review is not hampered by their absence. Id. at 608. However, the trial court in this case has failed to make specific findings concerni…
-
Lopez v. Lopez, 780 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…13(3), Florida Statutes (1997), grant the trial court authority to protect awards of alimony and child support, respectively, by ordering a party who must pay alimony or child support to purchase or maintain a life insurance policy. In Milo v. Milo, 718 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we reversed an order requiring the payor spouse to maintain life insurance, if reasonably available, because the record contained no evidence of the payor’s ability to afford the insurance or of the actual cost of such a policy.…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)