EMILIO MARTINEZ, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
EMILIO MARTINEZ, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
718 So. 2d 368
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As in Llaguno v. ARI Mutual Ins. Co., 719 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) and Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So. 2d 591, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), “[u]pon the sole condition that the insured[s] file [a] sworn proof of loss required by the policy in support of ... [their] claim for additional insured damages, the order below denying appraisal is reversed on the authority of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sierra, 705 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and the cause is remanded with directions to order appraisal.”
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Poppy Chimerakis v. Sentry Ins. Mut. Co., 804 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…he limitations period. The lower court’s determination to the contrary was thus erroneous. We therefore reverse the order under review for the foregoing reasons and remand for further proceedings. Reversed. . Accord Martinez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 718 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Llaguno v. ARI Mut. Ins. Co., 719 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).…
-
Harrah v. Allstate Ins. Co., 721 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…mage claim. Based on the valid enforceable appraisal provision in the parties’ agreement, the order under review is reversed. The trial court is directed to enter an order compelling appraisal. As the insurer concedes, Martinez v. Allstate Ins, Co., 718 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), Llaguno v. ARI Mutual Ins. Co., 719 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So. 2d 691, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) control.…
-
Greenwood v. State, 802 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999). We must affirm because the motion and supporting memorandum of law contained a defective verification clause that said [*402] that the facts were “true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief See Mengore v. State, 718 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Affirmance is without prejudice to file a motion that bears a proper oath. See Fla. R.Crim. Pro. 3.987. Because the time for filing under Wood has now expired, appellant has thirty days from the issuance of the mandate in this a…
Authorities Cited
- Zenaida Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sierra, 705 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Hoyt v. ST. Lucie Cnty., 705 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Llaguno v. ARI Mut. Ins. Co., 719 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)