DALE GARNSEY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hoffman v. Hoffman, 793 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …ontinued violation of discovery orders specifically stating, “[bjecause multiple deadlines were ignored and court orders disregarded by the Husband, a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority took place.” In Hoffman v. Hoffman, 718 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), this court affirmed the trial court’s order striking the pleadings. Subsequently, a final hearing was held and the trial court entered an Amended Final Judgment on July 5, 2000. As a basis for his first point on appeal, Former…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Stewart v. Jones, 728 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …out a finding of contempt. The assessment of a fine in the discovery context must be predicated on a finding of contempt. See Hoffman v. Hoffman, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1539, - So. 2d -, 1998 WL 329575 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 1998); Hoffman v. Hoffman, 718 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Paramount Advisors, Inc. v. Schwartz, 591 So. 2d 671, 673 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (citing Palm Shores v. Nobles, 149 Fla. 103, 5 So. 2d 52 (1941)); Florida Physicians Ins. Reciprocal v. Baliton, 436 So. 2d 1110, 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1…
• Alich v. Clapp, 926 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …te Judge. The first issue for us to consider is whether the trial court erred in striking the father’s pleadings. Although it is a very harsh sanction, it was within the trial court’s discretion to strike the father’s pleadings. Hoffman v. Hoffman, 718 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). It was also within the court’s discretion to deny the father the ability to present evidence on testimony at the trial with respect to financial issues. Id. Therefore, on this issue we affirm. Next, the father is correct that t…

Authorities Cited

• Heaton v. State, 711 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)