JEFFREY MERRITT, A/K/A PAUL PEAVA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1998-10-09
No. 97-02701
PARKER, C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.
718 So. 2d 1263 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The State must produce competent evidence to corroborate prior convictions used in calculating a defendant's guidelines scoresheet when the defendant objects.


Facts & Procedural History

Jeffrey Merritt was sentenced for burglary and objected to the inclusion of points on his scoresheet for certain prior convictions. The trial court di…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Merritt appeals his sentence for burglary. He argues that the trial court erred when it did not require the State to corroborate the accuracy of the prior convictions that were used in computing his guidelines scoresheet. In addition, Mr. Merritt argues that the 1995 sentencing guidelines are unconstitutional.

At sentencing, Mr. Merritt objected to the inclusion of points on the scoresheet for certain prior convictions. We agree that the State was required to produce competent evidence of the prior convictions in light of Mr. Merritt’s objection. See Wills v. State, 561 So. 2d 1355, 1356 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse his sentence for burglary and remand for resentencing.

This court recently requested the supreme court to determine the constitutionality of the 1995 guidelines as a matter requiring immediate resolution. See Heggs v. State, 718 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). It is not entirely clear whether Mr. Merritt’s sentence would be affected by calculation under the earlier guidelines. Thus, upon remand, if he chooses, he may raise and preserve this issue in the trial court.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

PARKER, C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw