EILEEN M. BRAKE AND DENISE BACALLAO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE DENNIS L. MURPHY, JR., APPELLANTS,
v.
IN RE THE ESTATE OF EILEEN E. MURPHY, EVE MURPHY, AND RICHARD MURPHY, APPELLEES
EILEEN M. BRAKE AND DENISE BACALLAO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE DENNIS L. MURPHY, JR., APPELLANTS,
IN RE THE ESTATE OF EILEEN E. MURPHY, EVE MURPHY, AND RICHARD MURPHY, APPELLEES
719 So. 2d 333
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order in all respects. Because the appellants’ attorney, Robert M. Brake, relitigates issues that have already been considered in this interminable and vexatious litigation, we grant the appellees attorney’s fees. See Brake v. Estate of Murphy, 678 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Apgar & Markham Constr. OF Fla., Inc. v. Apgar, 678 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)