RODOLPHO JARAMILLO, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF CORAL GABLES, APPELLEE
RODOLPHO JARAMILLO, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
CITY OF CORAL GABLES, APPELLEE
719 So. 2d 376
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. § 932.701(2)(h), Fla. Stat. (1997); City of Fort Lauderdale v. Baruch, 718 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Munoz v. City of Coral Gables, 695 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Salazar v. In re Forfeiture OF $182, 728 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…, it was my [property].” This conelu-sory statement did nothing to overcome the legal effect of Salazar’s relinquishment of rights and was insufficient to establish standing. See § 932.701(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (1997); Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables, 719 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Munoz v. City of Coral Gables, 695 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Munoz v. The City OF Coral Gables, 695 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- McCOMBS v. State, 718 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- City OF Fort Lauderdale v. Jacolyn Baruch, 718 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)