HOLIDAY INN, APPELLANT,
v.
LISA L. JOHNSON, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1998-09-23
No. 97-3049
BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
719 So. 2d 942 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A claimant must notify the employer of dissatisfaction with an authorized physician before seeking authorization for an alternate provider under the workers' compensation statute.


Facts & Procedural History

The claimant sought payment for psychiatric treatment from an unauthorized psychiatrist after her accident. The employer had authorized a different ps…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order awarding benefits under the workers’ compensation statute. We reverse the portion of the order awarding medical benefits but in all other respects we affirm without discussion.

Approximately three years after her accident, Lisa L. Johnson began a course of treatment with an unauthorized psychiatrist, Dr. Arturo Gonzalez. The employer had authorized psychiatric treatment but had referred Johnson to Dr. Rafael Gomez. Johnson requested payment for past and future treatment with Dr. Gonzalez, which the employer denied. Under section 440.13(3), Florida Statutes (1991), the statute in effect at the time of the accident, a claimant has a duty to make the employer aware that she objects to further treatment by the authorized physician before she will be entitled to authorization of an alternate provider. See Marcy v. Charlotte County Sheriffs Office, 599 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The record does not contain any evidence that Johnson made her dissatisfaction with Dr. Gomez known to the employer. Therefore, she failed to comply with the dictates of section 440.13(3), and the judge of compensation claims should not have authorized payment for medical care provided by Dr. Gonzalez.

We therefore reverse that portion of the order awarding payment for past and future psychiatric treatment with Dr. Gonzalez. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw