RANDOLPH BARFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDOLPH BARFIELD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
719 So. 2d 1010
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)
Caution
Cited by 42 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s judgments of conviction for burglary and petit theft in all respects but remand for correction of the judgments to reflect that appellant was found guilty of these offenses following a jury trial, rather than a guilty plea, and that his petit theft conviction is a second degree misdemeanor. AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of judgments.
POLEN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (42 total)
-
Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000)…. Here, as observed by the Second District in the decision below, all of the provisions of chapter 97-239, Laws of Florida (which created the Act) pertain to reoffen-ders. Accord Jackson v. State, 744 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Young v. State, 719 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Where, as here, there is a logical nexus between the statute’s various provisions, the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution has not been violated. DOUBLE JEOPARDY Next, Grant asserts that the two concurrent,…1 / 2
-
Rollinson v. State, 743 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…re-enactment of the chapter law into the Florida Statutes.” Williams v. State, 729 So. 2d 1005, 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). This court has previously held that the Act does not violate the single subject requirement of Article III. See Young v. State, 719 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So. 2d 915 (Fla.1999). IV SEPARATION OF POWERS Rollinson argues that section 775.082(8) “effectively gives a state attorney mandatory sentencing authority over a criminal defendant, thus eliminating a trial c…
-
Verro Chambers v. State, 752 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…kson v. State, 744 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 749 So. 2d 503 (Fla.1999); Grant v. State, 745 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Eckford, 725 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 4th DCA), review dismissed, 732 So. 2d 326 (Fla.1999); Young v. State, 719 So. 2d 1010, 1011-12 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), review denied, 727 So. 2d 915 (Fla.1999). In Jackson, this court held: [T]his act does not violate the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution because each section of chapter 97-239, Laws of Florida, dea…
Previewing 3 of 42 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence