JAMES D. HAY AND LILLIAN MAE HAY, APPELLANTS,
v.
LYMAN A. SALISBURY, APPELLEE
JAMES D. HAY AND LILLIAN MAE HAY, APPELLANTS,
LYMAN A. SALISBURY, APPELLEE
88 Fla. 496
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen .and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hay v. Lyman A. Salisbury and Ruth Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446 (Fla. 1926)…set forth in the plea of the respondents as the suit in which the rights of the complainant in the instant case were adjudicated was appealed to this court, and the final decree of the lower court affirmed by a per curiam opinion. Hay v. Salisbury, 88 Fla. 496, _ South Rep. _. It seems that after the final decree in the former suit and pending the appeal thereof to this court, the appellant instituted her suit for specific performance. "The foundation principle upon which the doctrine of res-judicata re…