GARY L. DOLES, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1998-10-29
No. 93232
Harding, C.J., Overton, J., Shaw, J., Kogan, J., Anstead, J., Pariente, J., Wells, J.
720 So. 2d 240 Florida Supreme Court (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida Supreme Court held that additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm cannot be added where the defendant's sole conviction is for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, as the firearm possession is the essential element of the underlying offense.


Holding

Additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm may not be assessed where the carrying or possessing of the firearm is the essential element of the underlying offense.


Headnotes

[1] Sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during commission of a crime cannot be added where firearm possession is the essential element of the underlying of…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may not be assessed against a defendant's sentencing score where the carrying or possessing of a firearm is the essential element of the underlying offense”

The Court's statement of the controlling legal rule regarding double-counting of firearm sentencing enhancements.

Facts & Procedural History

Gary L. Doles was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and received additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a fir…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Doles v. State, 710 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinions in State v. Walton, 693 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), approved, 717 So. 2d 522, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S402 (Fla.1998), and Galloway v. State, 680 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), concerning the issue of whether additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may be added to a defendant’s sentencing score where the defendant is convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently resolved this conflict in White v. State, 714 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1998), wherein we held that it is error for a trial court to assess additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm where the sole underlying crime is carrying a concealed firearm or possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may not be assessed against a defendant’s sentencing score where the carrying or possessing of a firearm is the essential element of the underlying offense. Id. at 443-44. In so holding, we approved Galloway and quashed the decision in White v. State, 689 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Therefore, in accordance with our decision in White, we quash the district court’s decision in Doles.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw