FREDERICK C. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
ERIN P. DAVIS, APPELLEE
FREDERICK C. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
ERIN P. DAVIS, APPELLEE
721 So. 2d 424
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
With regard to rehabilitative alimony and distribution of property, we find the final judgment adequate to allow meaningful appellate review, and we affirm. Appellant also questions the order requiring him to pay seventy percent of appellee’s attorneys’ fees. Because no actual award of fees has been made, this question is not ripe for appellate review.
AFFIRMED.
JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weiland v. Dorelle Weiland, Robert Koop Johnson & Robert Koop Johnson, P.A., 814 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…sdiction to award attorney’s fees to the husband’s attorney, the trial court was without jurisdiction to grant Mr. Johnson’s motion to impose a charging hen. See Keister v. Polen, 471 So. 2d 656, 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see also Feltman v. Feltman, 721 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse the order granting the charging lien and conclude that we need not address the remaining issues raised on appeal. Reversed. GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.…
-
Baker & Hostetler, LLP v. Swearingen, 998 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…erly broad language of that motion renders it insufficient, as a matter of law, to constitute adequate notice.” Thus, the Vazquez court determined that the notice was facially inadequate. This is not so in the case before us. In Feltman v. Feltman, 721 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the opinion as it addresses charging liens says simply: We also find error in entry of the post-judgment order enforcing and liquidating a charging lien in favor of the husband’s former trial counsel. The trial court lacked jur…
-
Sizemore v. Sizemore, 767 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…hus, the finding is not based upon competent substantial evidence, is clearly erroneous, and cannot be used to support the judgment. See § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (1999); Doerflein v. Doerflein, 724 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1998); Feltman v. Feltman, 721 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1998). Second, the court determined that Leon failed to keep adequate records of his activity with respect to the account. Lastly, the court found that Leon failed to show how his efforts benefitted the account more than if it had sim…