LOREN DANIELS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1998-10-29
No. 92899
Harding, C.J., Overton, J., Shaw, J., Kogán, J., Anstead, J., Pariente, J., Wells, J.
721 So. 2d 717 Florida Supreme Court (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida Supreme Court held that sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm cannot be added to a defendant's scoresheet when the sole offense is carrying a concealed weapon, resolving a conflict between district courts.


Holding

Additional sentencing points for possessing or carrying a firearm may not be assessed where the sole underlying offense is carrying a concealed weapon or possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.


Headnotes

[1] Sentencing points for firearm possession cannot be added when the firearm offense itself is the sole underlying crime.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Daniels was charged with carrying a concealed weapon as his sole offense, and the trial court assessed additional sentencing points for firearm posses…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Daniels v. State, 709 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinion in Galloway v. State, 680 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), concerning the issue of whether additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm may be assessed to the defendant’s sentencing scoresheet pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(12) where the defendant’s sole offense is carrying a concealed weapon. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently resolved this issue in White v. State, 714 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1998), wherein we held that additional sentencing points for possessing or carrying a firearm may not be assessed against a defendant where the sole underlying offense is carrying a concealed weapon or possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We reasoned that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and section 921.0014, Florida Statutes (1993), do not contemplate the addition of sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm where such act is the essential element of the underlying offense. 714 So. 2d at 443. In so holding, we approved the Fourth District’s opinion in Galloway.

Therefore, we quash the decision below in accordance with our opinion in White.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGÁN, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Haridopolos v. Citizens FOR Strong Schs., Inc., 78 So. 3d 605 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …standards.7 In addition, the language of article IX, section 1, itself states that the adequate provision of these fundamental values “shall be made by law,” indicating the provision is not self-executing. See St. John Medical Plans, Inc. v. Gutman, 721 So. 2d 717, 719 (Fla.1998) (finding the language of the constitutional provision that included the unambiguous phrase “as provided by law” clearly evidenced the provision was not self-executing). This language is at most a directive to the Legislature to act t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw