JAMES LEE RUDOLPH, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Valley v. State, 105 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …s record. See Mathew v. State, 837 So. 2d 1167, 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“[N]ot every act or comment that might be interpreted as demonstrating less than neutrality on the part of the judge will be deemed fundamental error.”); cf. Nichols v. State, 721 So. 2d 807, 808 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (court’s asking witness to identify the defendant after the prosecutor chose not to did not rise to the level of fundamental error where the defendant: (1) was followed from the scene and kept in view until being arrested; (…
• Sanders v. State, 739 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 921.051(l)(a); Ciccarelli v. State, 531 So. 2d 129 (Fla.1988); Nichols v. State, 721 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Jackson v. State, 707 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…
• POE v. State, 746 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …Stat. (1997). Such questioning may be necessary, in the court’s discretion to ascertain the truth, Watson v. State, 190 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 960, 88 S.Ct. 339, 19 L.Ed.2d 369 (1967), or to clarify an issue, Nichols v. State, 721 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), James v. State, 388 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The court’s examination of witnesses becomes an abuse of discretion “only when it appears that the judge departs from neutrality or expresses bias or prejudice in his comments i…

Authorities Cited

• Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)