TIMOTHY TYLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TIMOTHY TYLER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
722 So. 2d 970
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Our af-firmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s filing a proper rule 3.850 motion. Brown v. State, 661 So. 2d 95, 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987.
STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.A.-W. v. State, 873 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…cific birthday or the maximum term of imprisonment is error because such language could allow the sentence to be construed as running longer than the statutory maximum provided for the particular offense.”). The state contends that E.J.R. v. State, 722 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) is on point. There, we remanded a disposition order for correction. We wrote that an amended order “should be corrected to reflect that the maximum term of community control that can be imposed on [the child] is one year, which i…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Harris, 661 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Brown v. State, 661 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)