KIRK I. BROWN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Power Corp. v. City OF Casselberry, 793 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …proceeding under the so-called TVA Act, KRS 96.550 to 96.900, to acquire an electric system within its boundaries has the right to have the price determined by appraisal under the provisions of the franchise ordinance); see also Paneson v. Paneson, 723 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (arbitrators determined value of marital assets); Goldman v. Chang, 622 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (arbitrators determined value of stock). The 1971 franchise provided that the parties would submit to arbitration on the sole [*1…
• L & H Constr. Co., Inc. v. Circle Redmont, Inc., 55 So. 3d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
  …Fla. 3d DCA 1984). In the event an agreement is ambiguous, the court should follow a construction that best comports with logic, reason, and the purposes underlying the parties’ agreement. See Blackshear Mfg. Co., 102 So. at 754; Paneson v. Paneson, 723 So. 2d 385, 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Biltmore Sys., Inc. v. Mai Kai, Inc., 413 So. 2d 458, 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Gold Coast Media, Inc. v. Meltzer, 751 So. 2d 645, 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The parties’ conduct through their course of dealings is also consider…
• Univ. OF Miami v. Lee Frank, M.D., Ph.D., 920 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …established that in the event an “ambiguity exists in a contract construction, the court should arrive at an interpretation ‘consistent with reason, probability, and the practical aspect of the transaction between the parties.’ ” Paneson v. Paneson, 723 So. 2d 385, 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(quoting Biltmore Sys., Inc. v. Mai Kai, Inc., 413 So. 2d 458, 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)). Our analysis here comports with this admonition. The contrary position urged upon us by Frank is illogical. If a Medical School faculty m…

Authorities Cited

• Tucker v. State, 701 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)