RICHARD MAYCENE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICHARD MAYCENE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
723 So. 2d 394
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion. Defendant is entitled to recalculation of his sentencing guidelines scoresheet because the scoresheet does not reflect any supporting calculations for the scored prior-offenses points, Williams v. State, 658 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and there is no documentation attached to the scoresheet supporting the assessed points. Compare Dowdy v. State, 700 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). This cause is remanded to the trial court for further consideration of the motion.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 826 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…d portion of the scoresheet, there must be a listing of the name, and statute number, of each offense which is being scored. For this proposition, defendant relies on Williams v. State, 658 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). See also Maycene v. State, 723 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). He contends that he is entitled to a recalculation of his scoresheet and a resentencing. We find no deficiency in the scoresheet and affirm the denial of relief. The category three scoresheet contains spaces for the entry of num…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Artis Williams v. State, 658 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Dowdy v. State, 700 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)