WILLIE GABRIEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE GABRIEL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
723 So. 2d 899
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Appellant’s plea was entered over eleven years ago and his petition for writ of error coram nobis is barred by laches. See State v. Taylor, 722 So. 2d 890, 1998 WL D2635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Gregersen v. State, 714 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, No. 93,801 (Fla. Dec. 3, 1998). As in Gregersen, we certify conflict with Peart v. State, 705 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. granted, 722 So. 2d 193 (Fla.1998).
WARNER, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gino Kalici v. State, 755 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…This court has repeatedly held petitions for writs of error coram nobis are time barred by laches if filed more than two years after judgment and sentence have become final. See State v. Elise, 727 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Gabriel v. State, 723 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Taylor, 722 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The Florida Supreme Court recently agreed with this position when it held the two-year' time limit contained in rule 3.850 applies to petitions for writs of error coram nobis.…
Authorities Cited
- Roan Peart v. State, 705 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Knafel v. State, 714 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- State v. Taylor, 722 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)