BILLY RICE PARKER, A MINOR, BY ROENA IRENE LAMB, HIS MOTHER, AND J. J. LAMB, FOSTER FATHER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
ANNA LULA GATES AND HOLY NAME ACADEMY OF SAN ANTONE, PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's award of custody of a nine-year-old minor child to his biological mother, Roena Irene Lamb, but reversed provisions granting visitation rights to Anna Lula Gates, who had previously cared for the child. The court held that while the mother's fitness to care for the child supported the custody award, the detailed visitation schedule could not be legally enforced against the mother's wishes.
The court affirmed the award of custody to the mother and the court's retention of jurisdiction to make further orders in the child's best interest, but reversed the visitation provisions as unenforceable against the mother's wishes because they were not supported by evidence and the applicable law.
“In awarding the custody to the mother, the chancellor found on supporting evidence that the mother is a proper person to care for the child, therefore the order in so far as it awards the custody of the boy to his mother and retains jurisdiction to make further orders is necessary for the child's welfare, is affirmed; but the remainder of the order is reversed as it is not warranted by the evidence and the law applicable thereto, and cannot legally be enforced against the wishes of the child's mother.”
The court's holding that custody to the mother is affirmed but the visitation provisions are reversed as unenforceable against the mother's wishes.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBilly Rice Parker, a minor child approximately nine years old, was the biological child of Roena Irene Lamb. Anna Lula Gates had custody of the child …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Visitation Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
This writ of error was allowed and taken to an order awarding the custody of a minor child, the order-being as follows: “The above entitled cause coming on for final hearing upon pleadings in said cause and proofs as taken in open court, and the court being fully advised in the premises, does ORDER, ADJUDGE AND DECREE that the care,, custody and control of Billy Rice Parker be awarded to the complainant, Roena Irene Lamb until said'child shall.arrive at the age of 21 years, or until the further order of this court.
“It is further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the defendant, Anna Lula Gates, shall have the right to have said Billy Rice Parker visit and remain with her for week end trips beginning Friday afternoon and ending on Monday morning on the second week end, which shall be the first Friday after the second Thursday of each of the following months, for each and every year, that is January, March, May, July, September and November, provided however that during the school term such week end visits shall.be from Saturday morning until Sunday afternoon, that also said child shall visit with the, defendant, Anna Lula Gates, for the last fifteen days of the month of June of each year hereafter during the continuance of this order. “It is further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that for the present month of July that the week end visit of said child to the defendant, Anna Lula Gates, shall commence on the afternoon of the 18th and shall terminate on the morning of the 21st.
“It is further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that it shall be the duty of the respective parties, to-wit, Roena Irene Lamb and Anna Lula Gates to see that said child is delivered to the party entitled to the custody ©r the visits as herein provided whenever said child is in their possession, as per the terms of this order. This may be done by the respective parties delivering said child either in person or by placing said child in the care of some, transportation company with his transportation pMd.. “It is further ordered that this court does expressly resérve jurisdiction over said child for the purpose of making such other or further orders as the best interest of said child shall demand.”
It appears that the minor child, about nine years of age, is the child of the plaintiff in error Roena Irene Lamb; that Anna Lula Gates had the custody of the child during the greater part of its life, but the mother had not relinquished her right to the custody of the child; that the mother is now married and she and her husband can suitably provide for the child’s custody and general welfare.
In awarding the custody to the mother, the chancellor found on supporting evidence that the mother is a proper person to care for the child,, therefore the order in so far as it awards the custody' of the boy to his mother and retains jurisdiction to make further orders is necessary for the child’s welfare, is affirmed; but the remainder of the order is reversed as it is not warranted by the evidence and the law applicable thereto, and cannot legally be enforced against the wishes of the child’s mother. See 29 Cyc. .1590-1.
It is so ordered.
Taylor, O. J., and Whitfield, PIllis, Browne and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
von Eiff v. Leonor Azicri and Roberto Azicri, 720 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1998)…o the child, to force such interaction against the express wishes of at least one parent.... BACKGROUND At common law, grandparents had no legal right to visit their grandchildren if the child’s parents opposed the visitation. See Parker v. Gates, 89 Fla. 76,103 So. 126 (1925); Olds v. Olds, 356 N.W. 2d 571, 572-73 (Iowa 1984); see also Theresa H. Sykora, Grandparent Visitation Statutes: Are the Best Interests of the Grandparent Being Met Before Those of the Child?, 30 Fam. L.Q. 753, 758 (1996). Thus, a…
-
Sheehy v. Sheehy, 325 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…ded to a fit parent is unjustified and unenforceable.1 In view whereof, the order appealed from is, in this regard, reversed. In all other respects it is affirmed. McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur. . See Parker v. Gates (1925), 89 Fla. 76, 103 So. 126; Rodriguez v. Rodriguez (Fla.App. 3rd, 1974), 295 So. 2d 328; Lee v. Kepler (Fla.App.3rd, 1967), 197 So. 2d 570.…
-
LEE v. Kepler, 197 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…ruling is based on two grounds urged by the appellant. First, a similar order granting week end visitation to a non-parent, of a child whose custody had been awarded to a fit parent, was held to be unjustified and unenforceable, in Parker v. Gates, 89 Fla. 76, 103 So. 126. Secondly, as a result of the adoption of the child by the step-mother, the rights of the grandmother to partial custody or visitation as previously granted in the divorce suit were vitiated, as to the child’s step-mother, and therefore…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence