C.K.C. INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
CHELSEA PARC OF TUSCAWILLA, LTD., RESPONDENT
C.K.C. INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
CHELSEA PARC OF TUSCAWILLA, LTD., RESPONDENT
724 So. 2d 163
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. See Ford v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 436 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 444 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1984); Jackson v. Pinellas Imaging Cotp., 661 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Kenn Air Corp. v. Gainesville-Alachua County Regional Airport Authority, 593 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Campbell v. American Pioneer Savings Bank, 565 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.
GRIFFIN, C.J., and W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scot Peterson v. Pollack, 290 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)…y those interpretations to the amended complaint’s allegations here. The phrase “bad faith,” as used in section 768.28(9)(a), has been “equated with the actual malice standard.” Parker v. State of Fla. Bd. of Regents ex rel. Fla. State Univ., 724 So. 2d 163, 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (citation omitted). The phrase “malicious purpose,” as used in section 768.28(9)(a), has been interpreted as meaning the conduct was committed with “ill will, 10 hatred, spite, [or] an evil intent.” Eiras v. Florid…
-
Parker v. State of Fla. Bd. OF Educ., 865 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…BENTON, J. On remand from our decision in Parker v. Fla. Bd. of Regents ex rel. Fla. State Univ., 724 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), judgment was entered against appellees for breach of a salary contract “based upon a conditional contract which was capable of being performed by FSU within one year.” 724 So. 2d at 169-70. On account of salary disputes in ensui…
-
Reed v. Waters (M.D. Fla. 2024)…manner of permissible strip searches. See generally Fla. Stat. § 901.211. - 28- ---PAGE 28--- Courts construing the term “bad faith” in section 768.28(9)(a) use the actual malice standard. Parker v. State Bd. of Regents ex rel. Fla. State Univ., 724 So. 2d 163, 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The term “malicious purpose” in section 768.28(9)(a) means the conduct must be committed with “ill will, hatred, spite, [or] an evil intent.” Reed v. State, 837 So. 2d 366, 369 (Fla. 2002). For conduct to satisfy the wanton…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ford v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 436 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Kenn AIR Corp. v. Gainesville-Alachua Cnty. Reg'l Airport Auth., 593 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Campbell v. Am. Pioneer Sav. Bank formerly known as First Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 565 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Lurie v. Barnett Bank OF LEE Cnty., N.A., 661 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)