DONNIE KEITH SASSNETT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1998-12-31
No. 97-3667
ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.
724 So. 2d 174 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, J.

BROWNING, J.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the conviction and sentence in all respects and certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same question certified in Locke v. State, 719 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998): DOES THE FAIL URE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)
    …view granted, No 97,119, 761 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Feb. 21, 2000) Departure Sentence Rider v. State, 724 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), review granted, 735 So. 2d 1287 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 95,060) Deviation from Oral Pronouncement Sassnett v. State, 724 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), review granted, 741 So. 2d 1137 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 94,812) Costs Error Seccia v. State, 720 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), review granted, 727 So. 2d 910 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 94,138) Scoresheet Error Smith v. State, 721 S…
    1 / 2
  • McCELLAN v. State, 768 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …n of the trial court, we decline to address this un-preserved issue. The actions of the lower tribunal did not rise to the level of fundamental error. Locke v. State, 719 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (general division en banc); Sassnett v. State, 724 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We re-certify the question of great public importance raised in Locke, 719 So. 2d at 1252. AFFIRMED. ALLEN and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR. . Circuit Judge Frederick D. Smith presided over the combination suppression/probation revoca…
  • Donnie Keith Sassnett v. State, 760 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 2000)
    …ifying the following question to be one of great public importance: DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR? Sassnett v. State, 724 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000), we answer the certified question in the negative. We approve the decision below and…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw