SOMERSET ON LAKE SAUNDERS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1999-01-22
No. 98-1479
GRIFFIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
725 So. 2d 421 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the Unemployment Appeals Commission's order, finding the employee was entitled to unemployment benefits.


Facts & Procedural History

An employee sought unemployment benefits after leaving her job. The employer argued she voluntarily quit without good cause or was discharged for misc…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Somerset on Lake Saunders, Inc. (Somerset) appeals the order entered by the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) affirming the decision of the appeals referee that Marlene Hutcheson is entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Somerset first maintains that Ms. Hutche-son is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits because she voluntarily terminated her employment without good cause attributable to her employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). However, the record evidence supports the conclusion reached by the appeals referee that Ms. Hutcheson sustained her burden of proving that she did not voluntarily quit her job, but instead her employment was terminated by Somerset.

Next, Somerset contends that Ms. Hutche-son is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits because she was discharged for misconduct. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). Again, the record supports the appeals referee’s finding that Ms. Hutcheson did not engage in any misconduct. Accordingly, we affirm. See Brooks v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 695 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw