TOMMY THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TOMMY THOMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
725 So. 2d 1148
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Tommy Thomas appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probation and also seeks correction of a scrivener’s error in the revocation order. The evidence presented at the revocation hearing supports the trial court’s determination that Thomas wilfully violated his probation and, therefore, we affirm the revocation order. Because Thomas failed to seek correction of the scrivener’s error in the trial court and because the error is not fundamental, he is precluded from raising this issue on appeal. See § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996).
Affirmed.
BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)…ce is in error because it conflicts with the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence at the sentencing hearing. See Greenwood v. State, 720 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, 727 So. 2d 905 (Fla.1998) (Case No. 94,142); Thomas v. State, 725 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), review granted, 729 So. 2d 396 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 94,469). Prior to the Act, this type of error was corrected on appeal despite lack of preservation because the error implicated due process concerns that a [*104] defendant have…1 / 3
-
Thomas v. State, 763 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2000)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Thomas v. State, 725 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the basis of direct and express conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently resolved this conflict in Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000). Thomas contends that fundamental error occurred when the trial court…
-
Antoine Jelks v. State, 770 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1277 (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2000), was withdrawn and this opinion substituted in its place. . Specifically in Maddox, 760 So. 2d 89, the supreme court foreshadowed the outcome of an appeal then pending before it, Thomas v. State, 725 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), in which this court had determined that Mr. Thomas was precluded from raising the issue concerning the correction of his revocation order where he failed to seek correction of a “scrivener’s error’’ in the trial court and the err…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence