DAVID S. NUNES, AND DAVID NUNES, P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
DANIEL KELLY, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1999-02-17
No. 95-2316
POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
725 So. 2d 1277 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla.1983).

POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pace v. State, 776 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …which the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief, we affirm without prejudice to Pace seeking additional credit by filing a properly pled motion under rule 3.800 or timely motion pursuant to rule 3.850. See Walker v. State, 725 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). AFFIRMED. DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.…
  • Simmons v. State, 730 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …served. Since there is nothing in this record which substantiates appellant’s claim of entitlement to additional credit for jail time served, we affirm without prejudice to appellant’s seeking additional credit under rule 3.850. See Walker v. State, 725 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Appellant also contends the trial court erred in imposing an illegal excessive prison sentence that exceeded the statutory maximum for three counts. We also affirm on that issue. See State v. Myers, 713 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1998)…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw