EFRAIN RAMOS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EFRAIN RAMOS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
727 So. 2d 1110
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Efrain Ramos appeals a trial court order denying his motion for extension of time to file a post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The order of the trial court is affirmed without prejudice to Ramos to file his motion before the expiration of the time provided under the rule, which time has not as yet expired. We leave to the discretion of the trial court motions that may be filed by Ramos to amend his post-conviction motion as appropriate.
Affirmed as stated.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paul R. Levine, M.D. v. Paul R. Levine, M.D., 734 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…laint, but is undisputed in the parties’ briefs. . For reasons that are immaterial to our decision today, this court recently reversed that judgment insofar as it determined Tampa Ob-stelrics' rights. See Levine v. Saavedra, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D668, 727 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). . Chapter 607 is applicable to professional associations. See § 621.13(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). . These include sections 607.0902(7) and (8), Florida Statutes (1997), regarding shareholder determination of proposed voting rights…
-
Dominique Ambroise v. State, 932 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…er v. State, 907 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Denial of such a motion has been treated as an appealable order. See Giles v. State, 773 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), disapproved on other grounds, State v. Boyd, 846 So. 2d at 459; Ramos v. State, 727 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court denied the motion for extension of time, reasoning that the extension was unnecessary. The trial court’s order states, in part, “If exculpatory evidence exists which could not have been obtained with due diligenc…