LARRY BARTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1999-03-12
No. 98-1859
BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
728 So. 2d 340 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800 motion. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this ease and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and Spencer v. State, 717 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jackson v. State, 202 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …DCA 2009); [*448] Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 452 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Sterling v. State, 728 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Sequoia v. State, 678 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). KHOUZAM, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw