FRANK J. BOLTRI, PETITIONER,
v.
HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
FRANK J. BOLTRI, PETITIONER,
HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
728 So. 2d 772
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because petitioner has not demonstrated that the circuit court failed to afford him due process of law or departed from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition. See Sheley v. State, 703 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla.1998).
The proper remedy to correct a sentencing error is with the sentencing court, not a petition for writ of mandamus against the Florida Parole Commission and Department of Corrections. See Boyd v. State, 538 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Jefferson v. Wayne Dalton Corporation/Hartford, 793 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…dge of compensation claims is limited in this area because section 440.134 “clearly places the authorization and supervision of managed care' arrangements within the authority of the Agency for Health Care Administration.” Farhangi v. Dunkin Donuts, 728 So. 2d 772, 773-74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Acknowledging that managed care grievance procedures must be exhausted when managed care is provided, Mr. Jefferson argues that an employer or its insurance carrier must first prove that a managed care system was in plac…
-
Pascual Villazano v. Horace Bell Honey Co. & Ameritrust, 928 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…ng v. Cottongim, 728 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Appellant correctly asserts that the JCC did not have authority, pursuant to either statute or rule, to set a time limitation for filing the verified petition for fees. Farhangi v. Dunkin Donuts, 728 So. 2d 772, 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“A JCC has no authority or jurisdiction beyond what is specifically conferred by statute.”); McFadden v. Hardrives Constr., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied 583 So. 2d 1035 (Fla.1991) (“Unlike a cou…
-
McARTHUR v. Mental Health Care, 35 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…a JCC has “no authority or jurisdiction beyond what is specifically conferred by statute” and holding that a JCC has no jurisdiction to sanction an attorney for violating the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct) (quoting Farhangi v. Dunkin Donuts, 728 So. 2d 772, 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)); see also McFadden v. Hardrives Constr., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“Unlike a court of general jurisdiction, a [JCC] does not have inherent judicial power but only the power expressly conferred by chap…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1998)
- Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 703 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Boyd v. State, 538 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)