BRANDON MICHAEL EVANS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-03-03
No. 97-00599
PARKER, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.
728 So. 2d 802 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A sentencing error that improperly extends a defendant's incarceration is fundamental error and can be raised for the first time on appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant pleaded guilty and agreed to an eight-year prison sentence. However, the written sentence imposed by the trial court was sixteen years. …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Brandon Michael Evans appeals his sentences for two counts of third-degree murder, grand theft, and burglary of a conveyance. He contends that his sentences do not comply with his plea agreement. Although the State agrees that the sentences do not comply with the plea agreement, it argues that Evans is precluded from raising this issue on appeal because he failed to raise it below. See § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). We conclude that Evans may raise this issue for the first time on appeal because it involves fundamental error and we reverse.

In Bain v. State, 730 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), this court held that a sentencing error that improperly extends the defendant’s incarceration or supervision would likely be considered fundamental. In the present case, the plea agreement provided that Evans would serve eight years in prison. Although the trial court and both parties attempted to frame a sentence that would result in an eight-year prison term, the written sentence provides that Evans will serve sixteen years in prison. This sentencing error improperly extends Evans’ incarceration, and therefore, the error is fundamental. See Bain.

Accordingly, we reverse Evans’ sentences and remand this cause for the trial court to sentence Evans pursuant to his plea agreement. If the plea agreement cannot be achieved, Evans should be permitted to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

PARKER, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw