ANTHONY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTHONY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
729 So. 2d 1005
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Williams argues that his sentence as a violent career criminal under Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, is erroneous because the law violates the single subject requirement of Article III, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution, as held in Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315, 317 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 717 So. 2d 538 (Fla.1998). Mr. Williams does not have standing to make a constitutional challenge to his sentence on that ground because his offense occurred subsequent to the re-enactment of the chapter law into the Florida Statutes. See Scott v. State, 721 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED.
WARNER, TAYLOR, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rollinson v. State, 743 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…he Act on grounds that it violates the single subject requirement of Article III, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution because “his offense[s] occurred subsequent to the re-enactment of the chapter law into the Florida Statutes.” Williams v. State, 729 So. 2d 1005, 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). This court has previously held that the Act does not violate the single subject requirement of Article III. See Young v. State, 719 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So. 2d 915 (Fla.1999). IV SEPARATION O…
-
Williams v. State, 754 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…utional challenge to his sentence as a violent career criminal because his offense occurred subsequent to the re-enactment of the chapter law into the Florida Statutes. See also Bortel v. State, 743 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 729 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The opportunity to challenge his sentence based on the constitutionality of the statute ended on October 1, 1996 and appellant’s offenses occurred on April 27, 1997. See Scott, 721 So. 2d at 1246; Salters, 731 So. 2d at 826. Lik…
-
Dixon v. State, 745 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…quirement of Article III.” Scott v. State, 721 So. 2d 1245, 1246 (citing State v. Johnson, 616 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla.1993)). See Bortel v. State, 743 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Salters v. State, 731 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 729 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We recognize and certify to the Supreme Court that our holding, as to the window of opportunity to challenge the statute, conflicts with Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 717 So. 2d 538 (Fla.1998).…
Authorities Cited
- Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- McKinley Scott v. State, 721 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)