DENTALAND, P.A., APPELLANT,
v.
ST. STEPHEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY AND THROUGH LEF/DELRAY MALL, LTD., AND DAVID A. FRIEDMAN, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Since a party to a contract may not recover in fraud for alleged oral misrepresentations that have been adequately addressed or expressly contradicted in a later written contract, see Hillcrest Pacific Corp. v. Yamamura, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D520, 521, 727 So. 2d 1053, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Englezios v. Batmasian, 593 So. 2d 1077, 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Saunders Leasing Sys., Inc. v. Gulf Cent. Distribution Ctr., Inc., 513 So. 2d 1303, 1306-07 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); see also Schubot v. McDonalds Corp., 757 F.Supp. 1351, 1356 (S.D.Fla.1990), the fraud action was properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Susan Fixel, Inc. v. Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., 842 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…Invo Florida, Inc. v. Somerset Venturer, Inc., 751 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(eeonomic loss rule does not abolish cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty, even if there is an underlying contract); Clayton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 729 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(torts independent of contractual breach, such as fraudulent inducement, not barred by economic loss rule). See also Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So. 2d 973 (Fla.1999); PK Ventures, Inc. v. Raymond James & Assocs., Inc., 690 So. 2d 1…
-
Bates v. Rosique, 777 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…arricenses, S.A., 685 So. 2d 1238 (Fla.1996). However, where the alleged fraudulent misrepresentations are inseparably embodied in the parties’ subsequent agreement, the Economic Loss Rule will apply. See Clayton v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 729 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Pressman v. Wolf, 732 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). In Hotels of Key Largo, Inc. v. RHI Hotels, Inc., 694 So. 2d 74, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), this Court explained: Applying common sense to the supreme court’s analysis [in HTP, Lt…
-
Am. Express Travel Related Servs. v. Symbiont Software Grp., Inc., 837 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…oss rule. The economic loss rule bars claims in tort where there is no personal injury or damage to other property. Casa Clam Condominium Ass’n v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc., 620 So. 2d 1244 (Fla.1993); Clayton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 729 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The rule is premised on “the basic difference between contract law, which protects expectations, and tort law, which is determined by the duty owed to an injured party.” Casa Clara, 620 So. 2d at 1246. For this reason, an excepti…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hillcrest Pac. Corp. v. Yamamura, 727 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- Saunders Leasing Sys., Inc. v. Gulf Cent. Distrib. Ctr., Inc., 513 So. 2d 1303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
- Englezios v. Batmasian, 593 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- Schubot v. McDonalds Corp., 757 F. Supp. 1351 (S.D. Fla. 1990)