LARRY M. HUSKINS, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• A.B. v. State, 805 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …ion of drug paraphernalia. There is, however, a problem with the disposition order. When multiple offenses constitute the basis of a delinquency adjudication, the trial court must enter a separate disposition order for each offense. P.J.C. v. State, 730 So. 2d 791, 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Additionally, the period of commitment imposed may not exceed the maximum term of imprisonment that an adult could serve for the same offense. § 985.231(1)(a)(8), Fla. Stat. (1999). Therefore, we reverse the disposition orde…
• S.B. v. State, 834 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
  …his majority, at which time the department will lose jurisdiction over him. On remand, we point out that the trial court should enter a separate disposition order for each offense. A.B. v. State, 805 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); P.J.C. v. State, 730 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Reversed and remanded with instructions. SALCINES, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.…
• V.T. v. State, 782 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …no oral findings at the time of sentencing, and the written commitment order merely states that V.T. was found guilty of counts one and two. Furthermore, the trial court erred by entering only one commitment order for both offenses. P.J.C. v. State, 730 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Although the State acknowledges these errors, it argues V.T. did not preserve them for appeal. However, a sentence that patently fails to comport with statutory limitations is “illegal” and must be corrected as fundamental erro…

Authorities Cited

• THE Florida BAR v. Mullins, 527 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 1988)