MARIO COKA BORJA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA, N.A., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1999-03-31
No. 98-983
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON, and SORONDO, JJ.
730 So. 2d 799 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court held that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding costs because the order did not comply with the Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs.


Facts & Procedural History

After judgment was entered for the defendants, the trial court ordered the plaintiffs to pay a substantial amount in costs. The plaintiffs appealed th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in the action below appeal from an order awarding costs. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

After judgment was entered in favor of the defendants in this action, the trial court ordered the plaintiffs to pay $186,196.45 in costs. The trial court abused its discretion in determining taxable costs, as the order does not comply with the Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions. See In Re: Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions, Administrative Order, Florida Supreme Court, 7 Fla. L. Weekly 517 (Fla. Oct. 28, 1981), Printed In Florida Rules of Court at 1575 (West 1998).1

We therefore reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to award only those costs recoverable under the Uniform Guidelines. See Rodriguez v. Campbell, 720 So. 2d 266, 267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Franzen v. Lacuna Golf Ltd. Partnership, 717 So. 2d 1090, 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); James P. Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So. 2d 301, 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

. This opinion should not be read to restrict the trial court's general discretion to depart from the Guidelines when the facts of the case support such a departure. "Clearly, the trial court may deviate from such guidelines depending on the facts of the case as justice may require." Madi son v. Midland Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 648 So. 2d 1226, 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see also Great Horizons Dev., Inc. v. Minkin, 572 So. 2d 926 (Fla 3d DCA 1990). The facts of this case, as presented by the record on appeal, do not support such a departure.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ocean Club Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Curtis, 935 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
    …d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (quoting In re: Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions, 7 Fla. L. Weekly 517 (Fla.1981)), and there were no facts to support such a departure, see Borja v. Nationsbank of Fla., N.A., 730 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); State, Dep’t of Transp. v. Skidmore, 720 So. 2d 1125, 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that the trial court may “deviate from the Guidelines depending on the facts of the case as justice may require”), we agree. A trial court’s…
  • Saby v. J.C. Penney Life Ins. Co., 769 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
    …PER CURIAM. As the departure from the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions was within the trial court’s discretion, see Borja v. Nationsbank of Florida, N.A., 730 So. 2d 799, 799 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), the cost judgment is affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw