STUART R. CHARNER, APPELLANT,
v.
BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
STUART R. CHARNER, APPELLANT,
BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
730 So. 2d 809
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See §§ 443.101, .151(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Unemployment Appeals Comm’n v. Comer, 504 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 1987); Parzik v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 711 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Moreno v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 676 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Diaz v. State, 747 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…hat the marginal relevance of particular findings were outweighed by their potential for unfair prejudice, it could also exclude them. See Hayes v. State, 660 So. 2d 257, 261 (Fla.1995); State v. McClain, 525 So. 2d 420 (Fla.1988); Beckett v. State, 730 So. 2d 809, 811 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Finally, if certain autopsy results would tend to confuse the issues in the case, the trial court would also be justified in excluding them. For example, if the medical examiner testified that the victim died as a result of…
-
Phillips v. Dep't OF Juv. Just., 736 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…e qualified for an exemption, the agency was not under any obligation to give him one. This court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion. See Thomas v. Department of Juvenile Justice, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D932, 730 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, under the facts of this case,1 we must affirm. AFFIRMED. GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ„ and WEINSTEIN, PETER M., Associate Judge, concur. . Although the final order sets forth no specific findings of fact in support of th…
-
Int'l Union of Police Ass'ns v. State, 855 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…ior agency practice if the agency does not explain the deviation. However, a court “shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion.” § 120.68(7)(e), Fla. Stat. (2000). See also Thomas v. Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, 730 So. 2d 809, 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that the court could not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion); Fraser v. Lewis, 360 So. 2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (noting that the court was forbidden to substitute its ju…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Unemployment Appeals Comm'n v. Comer, 504 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 1987)
- Parzik v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 711 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
- Moreno v. State, 676 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)