PATRICK MORROW A/K/A NORMAN MORROW, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Kenneth Friedman, M.D. v. Heart Inst. OF Port ST. Lucie, Inc., 863 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2003)
  …y, “the disclosure of personal financial information may cause irreparable harm to a person forced to disclose it, in a case in which the information is not relevant.” Straub v. Matte, 805 So. 2d 99, 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also Mogul v. Mogul, 730 So. 2d 1287, 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). As noted by this Court, “As appropriate, the trial court may conduct an in-camera inspection of the subject records. In that context, the trial court may balance (on an ad hoc basis) ‘the right to privacy and the right to…
• Borck v. Abbie S. Borck, 906 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …95 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Article I, section 23, of the Florida Constitution protects the financial information of persons if there is no relevant or compelling reason to compel disclosure. See Friedman, 863 So. 2d at 194; Mogul v. Mogul, 730 So. 2d 1287, 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Here, the trial court ordered production of non-party financial information without any evidentiary inquiry as to its relevance to the petition for appointment of the guardian of the property. The court, relying entirely o…
• Posner v. Posner, 940 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …he father’s objections. The father argues that the financial information of private persons is protected by Florida’s constitutional right of privacy where there is no compelling reason for disclosure. See Art. I, § 23, Fla. Const.; Mogul v. Mogul, 730 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). He suggests that what he has given or lent to his daughter and how she supports herself is irrelevant to his son’s dissolution proceedings. We agree. The interrogatories do not address the father’s financial dealings with his s…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. State, 724 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
• Vaughn Walker v. State, 724 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)