J.G., APPELLANT,

v.

J.S., SR., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Deatrick S. Bolden v. State, 875 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …the property returned. Id. at 661. Similarly, the defendant is not entitled to have the property returned if the State intends in good faith to bring another criminal prosecution at which the items would be admissible in evidence. Oleandi v. State, 731 So. 2d 4, 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Kern v. State, 706 So. 2d 1366, 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). However, if the State is “unable to connect the items to specific criminal activity, and no one else can be identified who can demonstrate a superior possessory intere…
• Eight Hundred, Inc. v. State, 781 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …So. 2d 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). This inherent authority extends to property seized from the accused as well as others and it vests in the trial court the inherent power to assist the true owner in the recovery of his property. See Oleandi v. State, 731 So. 2d 4, 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“Once a criminal prosecution is instituted, the court in which that prosecution is pending acquires jurisdiction over that property to hear and determine all questions concerning its ownership if the property seized has an ev…
• Almeda v. State, 959 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …the property returned. Id. at 661. Similarly, the defendant is not entitled to have the property returned if the State intends in good faith to bring another criminal prosecution at which the items would be admissible in evidence. Oleandi v. State, 731 So. 2d 4, 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Kern v. State, 706 So. 2d 1366, 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). However, if the State is "unable to connect the items to specific criminal activity, and no one else can be identified who can demonstrate a superior possessory intere…