JUDITH RICHTER AND CAROL THOMPSON, APPELLANTS,

v.

GEORGIA E. HOFMANN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE PHILIP B. HOFMANN LIVING TRUST, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. COX, 943 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …Judgment on the pleadings can be granted only if, on the facts as admitted for purposes of the motion, the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment.’ ” Crocker v. Pleasant, 778 So. 2d 978, 981 n. 4 (Fla.2001) (quoting Windle v. W.W. Windle Co., 731 So. 2d 36, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)). As pleaded, however, Farm Bureau's complaint admits the possibility that wind may have caused forty-nine per cent of the damage. At the lower end of the spectrum-where a covered peril causes only minor damage, the deductibl…
• Crocker v. Pleasant, 778 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 2001)
  …accept as true all well-pleaded allegations of the non-moving party. Judgment on the pleadings can be granted only if, on the facts as admitted for purposes of the motion, the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment.” Windle v. W.W. Windle Co., 731 So. 2d 36, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). . The Fourteenth Amendment of the United •States Constitution provides that "[n]o State gh'all ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. . A claim under…
• First Fin. USA, Inc. v. Les Steinger, 760 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …accept as true all well-pleaded allegations of the non-moving party. Judgment on the pleadings can be granted only if, on the facts as admitted for purposes of the motion, the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment. Windle v. W.W.Windle Co., 731 So. 2d 36, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (citations omitted). Steinger argues that his motion for judgment on the pleadings was properly granted because he cannot be held liable for alleged wrongdoing committed while he was acting on behalf of Mutual. It is well-se…

Authorities Cited

• Sarasota Bank & Tr. Co. under the agreement with Henry E. Jones v. Rietz, 297 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
• Barnett Banks Tr. Co., N.A. v. Herr, 546 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)