REGINALD WELLS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Reginald Wells (Wells) was convicted of two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer, two counts of resisting arrest with violence, one count of reckless driving, and one count of driving with a' suspended license. The trial judge imposed concurrent county jail sentences for each conviction. In Pierce v. State, 681 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), this court held that only one conviction for resisting an officer with violence is permitted in connection with a single criminal episode or incident. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions that one of Wells’s convictions for resisting arrest with violence be vacated. We affirm the judgments and sentences for all other offenses.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
MINER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gracey v. Eaker, 837 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 2002)…022, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 550, 565 (1998) (“The elements of a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty are: (1) the existence of a fiduciary duty; (2) the breach of that duty; and (3) damage proximately caused by that breach.”). . In O'Keefe v. Orea, 731 So. 2d 680, 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the district court noted the existence of a fiduciary relationship not only between a psychiatrist and his patient who was an emotionally troubled minor prone to violence, but also between the psychiatrist and the parents o…
-
DOE v. Evans, 814 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2002)…or breach of fiduciary duty. See generally Palafrugell Holdings, Inc. v. Cassel, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D201, - So. 2d -, 2001 WL 20824 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan.10, 2001); Atlantic Nat’l Bank v. Vest, 480 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Thus, in O’Keefe v. Orea, 731 So. 2d 680, 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the First District concluded that a psychiatrist had a duty to warn the parents of a patient who attacked and killed his father of his potential for violent behavior based upon a fiduciary relationship between the psychiatr…
-
Attorney AD Litem FOR D.K. v. The Parents OF D.K., 780 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…e instant case where the child, who is over seventeen years old, has the ability to obtain her own treatment [*308] under the statute and has sufficient mental capacity to assert the privilege herself, as she has done here. We find O’Keefe v. Orea, 731 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), relied upon by respondents, is inapposite. The court, without citation to authority, stated that “[i]m-plicit in the parent’s right to consent to proposed medical treatment for his minor or otherwise incompetent child, is the ri…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tammi Jones v. Yellow CAB OF Pensacola Inc., 681 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)