BRITTON BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the sentences of three and one-half years’ imprisonment which were entered on resentencing after the trial court had granted a postconviction motion. The trial court orally imposed these sentences to be concurrent with any other sentence that Mr. Brown was serving. Unfortunately, the written sentence did not indicate that it was concurrent with “any active sentence being served,” but rather specifically listed some, but not all, of those active sentences. To avoid any possible confusion on the part of the Department of Corrections, the trial court shall modify the written sentences on remand to indicate that they are concurrent with any active sentence being served.
Affirmed with instructions.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Othouse v. State, 912 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…he circuit court of jurisdiction to rule on the pending motion. See State v. Williams, 780 So. 2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Othouse’s right to pursue his motion to mitigate sentence. See Lacquey v. State, 731 So. 2d 724, 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Affirmed. FULMER, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.…
-
Sallette v. State, 956 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…dice for appellant to pursue a ruling on his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion within sixty (60) days of the trial court’s receipt of the mandate in this appeal. Othouse v. State, 912 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Lacquey v. State, 731 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…