CALVIN PHALON WASHINGTON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by revoking the defendant’s probation. However, as the State properly concedes, the order of revocation must be vacated, and the cause remanded with directions for entry of a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements.1 Fairman v. State, 576 So. 2d 948, 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions.
. At the revocation of probation hearing, the trial court specifically stated that although the defendant had been arrested, it was not finding a violation of the condition that requires the defendant to live at liberty without violating any law. In contrast, the written order of revocation reflects that the defendant violated this condition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reynaldo Alexis v. State, 732 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. We deny the petition for mandamus. As we recently concluded in Nunez v. State, 731 So. 2d 865 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), “despite his indigency, [defendant] is not entitled to copies of public records free of charge, per Roesch v. State, 633 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1993), and section 119.07(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1997).”…
Authorities Cited
- Holly v. State, 576 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Fairman v. State, 576 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)